Locally Most Powerful Tests for Detecting Treatment Effects When Only a Subset of Patients Can Be Expected to "Respond" to Treatment

DOI10.2307/2531906zbMath0707.62265OpenAlexW2333571283WikidataQ41435674 ScholiaQ41435674MaRDI QIDQ3489335

W. J. Conover, David S. Salsburg

Publication date: 1988

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2531906

zbMATH Keywords

two-sample rank testsSavage scores

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Related Items (10)

Detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures in a two-sample problem ⋮ On using Lehmann alternatives with nonresponders ⋮ Inference With Interference Between Units in an fMRI Experiment of Motor Inhibition ⋮ Effect Modification and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies ⋮ Impact of Multiple Matched Controls on Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies ⋮ Risk Assessment for Quantitative Responses Using a Mixture Model ⋮ Mixture normal models in which the proportions of susceptibility are related to dose levels ⋮ Sample size calculations for mixture alternatives in a control group vs. treatment group design ⋮ Weighted M-statistics With Superior Design Sensitivity in Matched Observational Studies With Multiple Controls ⋮ A New u-Statistic with Superior Design Sensitivity in Matched Observational Studies

This page was built for publication: Locally Most Powerful Tests for Detecting Treatment Effects When Only a Subset of Patients Can Be Expected to "Respond" to Treatment