Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus

From MaRDI portal
Publication:351452

DOI10.1007/s10699-011-9235-xzbMath1279.01017arXiv1108.2885OpenAlexW2072656382WikidataQ55877841 ScholiaQ55877841MaRDI QIDQ351452

Mikhail G. Katz, Alexandre V. Borovik

Publication date: 11 July 2013

Published in: Foundations of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2885




Related Items (22)

Is Leibnizian calculus embeddable in first order logic?Toward a history of mathematics focused on proceduresGregory's sixth operationCauchy's infinitesimals, his sum theorem, and foundational paradigmsEuler's lute and Edwards's oudSmall oscillations of the pendulum, Euler's method, and adequalityTools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematicsThe Mathematical Intelligencer flunks the OlympicsA Cauchy-Dirac delta functionTen misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunkingPeriodic words connected with the tribonacci-Lucas numbersCauchy's work on integral geometry, centers of curvature, and other applications of infinitesimals19th-century real analysis, forward and backwardLarge-\( N\) limits of spaces and structuresLeibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyondThe notion of variable quantities \(\omega\) in Bolzano's early worksDid Weierstrass’s differential calculus have a limit-avoiding character? His definition of a limit inϵδstyleAn integer construction of infinitesimals: toward a theory of eudoxus hyperrealsToward a clarity of the extreme value theoremAlmost Equal: the Method of Adequality from Diophantus to Fermat and BeyondProofs and retributions, or: why Sarah can't take limitsControversies in the foundations of analysis: comments on Schubring's \textit{Conflicts}



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus