Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_21zbMath1148.68500OpenAlexW1502917083MaRDI QIDQ3524931

Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin

Publication date: 16 September 2008

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_21

zbMATH Keywords

argumentation semanticsskepticism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items

Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach, On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics, Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference, Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference, Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics, A logical account of formal argumentation

Cites Work

• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty