Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3524935
DOI10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25zbMath1148.68503OpenAlexW1572934910MaRDI QIDQ3524935
Claudette Cayrol, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex
Publication date: 16 September 2008
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25
Related Items
Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation ⋮ On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness ⋮ Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks ⋮ Towards an Extensible Argumentation System ⋮ Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks ⋮ Arguing with Valued Preference Relations ⋮ Argumentation in artificial intelligence ⋮ A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
This page was built for publication: Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks