Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25zbMath1148.68503OpenAlexW1572934910MaRDI QIDQ3524935

Claudette Cayrol, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex

Publication date: 16 September 2008

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Related Items

Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation ⋮ On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness ⋮ Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks ⋮ Towards an Extensible Argumentation System ⋮ Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks ⋮ Arguing with Valued Preference Relations ⋮ Argumentation in artificial intelligence ⋮ A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Coherence in finite argument systems.
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

This page was built for publication: Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks