What can be learned about dark energy evolution?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3530162

DOI10.1051/0004-6361:20065067zbMATH Open1151.85337arXivastro-ph/0602491OpenAlexW2108326946WikidataQ68673862 ScholiaQ68673862MaRDI QIDQ3530162

Author name not available (Why is that?)

Publication date: 15 October 2008

Published in: Astronomy & Astrophysics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We examine constraints obtained from SNIa surveys on a two parameter model of dark energy in which the equation of state w(z)=P(z)/ho(z) undergoes a transition over a period significantly shorter than the Hubble time. We find that a transition between wsim0.2 and wsim1 (the first value being somewhat arbitrary) is allowed at redshifts as low as 0.1, despite the fact that data extend beyond zsim1. Surveys with the precision anticipated for space experiments should allow only slight improvement on this constraint, as a transition occurring at a redshift as low as sim0.17 could still remain undistinguishable from a standard cosmological constant. The addition of a prior on the matter density OmegaMAT=0.3 only modestly improves the constraints. Even deep space experiments would still fail to identify a rapid transition at a redshift above 0.5. These results illustrate that a Hubble diagram of distant SNIa alone will not reveal the actual nature of dark energy at a redshift above 0.2 and that only the local dynamics of the quintessence field can be infered from a SNIa Hubble diagram. Combinations, however, seem to be very efficient: we found that the combination of present day CMB data and SNIa already excludes a transition at redshifts below 0.8.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602491







Recommendations





This page was built for publication: What can be learned about dark energy evolution?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3530162)