Forcing axioms and the continuum hypothesis

DOI10.1007/S11511-013-0089-7zbMath1312.03031OpenAlexW1967066310MaRDI QIDQ355984

Justin Tatch Moore, David Asperó, Paul B. Larson

Publication date: 25 July 2013

Published in: Acta Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11511-013-0089-7

zbMATH Keywords

large cardinalscontinuum hypothesisforcing axiomsset-forcing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Large cardinals (03E55) Continuum hypothesis and Martin's axiom (03E50) Generic absoluteness and forcing axioms (03E57)

Related Items (6)

Forcing axioms and the continuum hypothesis. II: Transcending \(\omega _1\)-sequences of real numbers ⋮ What makes the continuum ℵ₂ ⋮ How many real numbers are there? ⋮ P-ideal dichotomy and a strong form of the Suslin Hypothesis ⋮ More on weak diamond ⋮ Category forcings, 𝑀𝑀⁺⁺⁺, and generic absoluteness for the theory of strong forcing axioms

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Forcing axioms and the continuum hypothesis. II: Transcending \(\omega _1\)-sequences of real numbers
• The bounded proper forcing axiom and well orderings of the reals
• Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
• A weak version of \(\lozenge\) which follows from \(2^{\aleph_0}<2^{\aleph_1}\)
• The axiom of determinacy, forcing axioms, and the nonstationary ideal
• \(\omega_1\) and \(-\omega_1\) may be the only minimal uncountable linear orders
• Iterated Cohen extensions and Souslin's problem
• Proper Forcing
• Nonsplitting subset of _κ(κ⁺)
• CH with no Ostaszewski spaces
• BOUNDING BY CANONICAL FUNCTIONS, WITH CH
• First countable, countably compact spaces and the continuum hypothesis
• SET MAPPING REFLECTION

This page was built for publication: Forcing axioms and the continuum hypothesis