Predictor‐corrector procedures for pseudo‐dynamic tests
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3576553
DOI10.1108/02644400510619530zbMath1191.70003OpenAlexW2024111678MaRDI QIDQ3576553
Publication date: 30 July 2010
Published in: Engineering Computations (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400510619530
Vibrations in dynamical problems in solid mechanics (74H45) Computational methods for problems pertaining to mechanics of particles and systems (70-08) Numerical approximation of solutions of dynamical problems in solid mechanics (74H15) Nonlinear dynamics in mechanics (70K99)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis
- The discrete energy-momentum method. Conserving algorithms for nonlinear elastodynamics
- Explicit time integration algorithms for structural dynamics with optimal numerical dissipation
- The analysis of the generalized-\(\alpha\) method for nonlinear dynamic problems
- Frequency‐domain analysis of time‐integration methods for semidiscrete finite element equations—part II: Hyperbolic and parabolic–hyperbolic problems
- Enhanced integral form of the Newmark time stepping scheme for pseudodynamic testing
- EXPLICIT PREDICTOR–MULTICORRECTOR TIME DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS FOR LINEAR DYNAMICS
- EXPLICIT PREDICTOR–MULTICORRECTOR TIME DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS FOR NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS
- A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method
- An alpha modification of Newmark's method
- Explicit/implicit partitioning and a new explicit form of the generalized alpha method
- Robustness of the minimal control synthesis algorithm to non-linear plant with regard to the position control of manipulators
- Numerical integration of non‐linear elastic multi‐body systems
- Alternative characterization of time integration schemes
This page was built for publication: Predictor‐corrector procedures for pseudo‐dynamic tests
