The near coherence of filters principle does not imply the filter dichotomy principle
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3625565
DOI10.1090/S0002-9947-08-04806-XzbMath1173.03040MaRDI QIDQ3625565
Heike Mildenberger, Saharon Shelah
Publication date: 5 May 2009
Published in: Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)
Consistency and independence results (03E35) Applications of set theory (03E75) Remainders in general topology (54D40) Cardinal characteristics of the continuum (03E17)
Related Items (3)
Selective covering properties of product spaces ⋮ Diagonalising an ultrafilter and preserving a $P$-point ⋮ Selection principles in the Laver, Miller, and Sacks models
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Near coherence of filters. III: A simplified consistency proof
- There may be simple \(P_{\aleph _ 1}\)- and \(P_{\aleph _ 2}\)-points and the Rudin-Keisler ordering may be downward directed
- Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs
- Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N
- Distinguishing groupwise density numbers
- Covering the Baire space by families which are not finitely dominating
- Combinatorial Cardinal Characteristics of the Continuum
- Partitions and filters
- Consistency results about filters and the number of inequivalent growth types
- Compacts de fonctions mesurables et filtres non mesurables
- There are no Q-Points in Laver's Model for the Borel Conjecture
- On the existence of P-points in the Stone-Čech compactification of integers
- Norms on possibilities. I. Forcing with trees and creatures
- Forcing and stable ordered–union ultrafilters
- Groupwise dense families
This page was built for publication: The near coherence of filters principle does not imply the filter dichotomy principle
