How Often Likelihood Ratios are Misleading in Sequential Trials

DOI10.1080/03610920701713336zbMath1163.62061OpenAlexW1994491569MaRDI QIDQ3634525

Jeffrey D. Blume

Publication date: 25 June 2009

Published in: Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920701713336

zbMATH Keywords

Brownian motionmisleading evidencesequential trialslaw of likelihood

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Inference from stochastic processes (62M99) Sequential statistical design (62L05)

Related Items (2)

Bayesian revision of a prior given prior-data conflict, expert opinion, or a similar insight: a large-deviation approach ⋮ A likelihood paradigm for clinical trials

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Sequential analysis. Tests and confidence intervals
• Decisions as statistical evidence and Birnbaum's confidence concept
• How to Choose a Working Model for Measuring the Statistical Evidence About a Regression Parameter
• On the Probability of Observing Misleading Statistical Evidence
• The Effect of Sample Size on the Meaning of Significance Tests
• Statistical Methods Related to the Law of the Iterated Logarithm

This page was built for publication: How Often Likelihood Ratios are Misleading in Sequential Trials