Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3638140
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_9zbMath1203.68198OpenAlexW1517651437WikidataQ57499574 ScholiaQ57499574MaRDI QIDQ3638140
Pietro Baroni, Giovanni Guida, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin
Publication date: 2 July 2009
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_9
Decision theory (91B06) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)
Related Items (17)
Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems ⋮ Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation ⋮ A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation ⋮ AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks ⋮ Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses ⋮ Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger ⋮ An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support ⋮ Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties ⋮ On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks ⋮ Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications ⋮ Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results ⋮ On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance ⋮ Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview ⋮ Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
This page was built for publication: Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks