Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_10zbMath1245.91014OpenAlexW1559769092MaRDI QIDQ3638141

Marcelo Auday, Gustavo Adrián Bodanza

Publication date: 2 July 2009

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_10

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Games involving topology, set theory, or logic (91A44) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Social choice (91B14)

Related Items (3)

A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation ⋮ Graph aggregation ⋮ Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory
• Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
• Hierarchical Argumentation
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Aggregation of Attack Relations: A Social-Choice Theoretical Analysis of Defeasibility Criteria

This page was built for publication: Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence