An engineers' defence of the patch test

DOI10.1002/nme.1620190908zbMath0516.73080OpenAlexW2009190195MaRDI QIDQ3664563

B. M. Irons, Matti Loikkanen

Publication date: 1983

Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620190908

zbMATH Keywords

convergence criterionpatch testStummel's counter-example explained as technical misunderstanding

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics (74S99)

Related Items

A set of pathological test to validate new finite elements, Sur la convergence des méthodes d'éléments finis nonconformes pour des problèmes linéaires de coques minces. (On the convergence of nonconforming finite element method for linear thin shell problems), Optimal solid shells for nonlinear analyses of multilayer composites. I: Statics., An improved three‐node hybrid‐mixed element for Mindlin/Reissner plates, A new hybrid-mixed variational approach for Reissner-Mindlin plates. The MiSP model, Reduction of excessive energy in the four-noded membrane quadrilateral element. I: Linear theory -- compressible materials, Failures of the three‐dimensional patch test for large elastic deformations, On a finite element method with variable element topology, The arbitrary local mesh replacement method: An alternative to remeshing for crack propagation analysis