Acceptable contradictions: pragmatics or semantics? A reply to Cobreros et al.

DOI10.1007/s10992-012-9241-7zbMath1273.03017OpenAlexW2051660239MaRDI QIDQ373020

Peter Pagin, Uli Sauerland, Sam Alxatib

Publication date: 21 October 2013

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-92913

zbMATH Keywords

fuzzy logicnatural languageconjunctionvaguenesspragmaticscontradiction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fuzzy logic; logic of vagueness (03B52) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic of natural languages (03B65)

Related Items (6)

Paraconsistent logic ⋮ Foreword: Three-valued logics and their applications ⋮ Comparing Some Substructural Strategies Dealing with Vagueness ⋮ Vague judgment: a probabilistic account ⋮ Nonmonotonicity and Knowability: As Knowable as Possible ⋮ Pragmatic interpretations of vague expressions: strongest meaning and nonmonotonic consequence

Cites Work

• Tolerant, classical, strict
• Vagueness in communication. International workshop, ViC 2009, held as part of ESSLLI 2009, Bordeaux, France, July 20--24, 2009. Revised selected papers
• Vagueness, truth and logic
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Acceptable contradictions: pragmatics or semantics? A reply to Cobreros et al.