Modified Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedures
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3740078
DOI10.2307/2289016zbMath0603.62087OpenAlexW4241069978MaRDI QIDQ3740078
Publication date: 1986
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2289016
powermultiple comparisonsexamplessimultaneous inferencemultiple test proceduresexperimentwise error ratesequentially-rejective method for testingsimple Bonferroni inequalitystagewise modification of critical values
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Sequential statistical analysis (62L10) Compound decision problems in statistical decision theory (62C25)
Related Items
E-values: calibration, combination and applications ⋮ QuickMMCTest: quick multiple Monte Carlo testing ⋮ An improved uniformly more powerful exact Fisher–Hayter pairwise comparisons procedure ⋮ Global and multiple test procedures using ordered \(p\)-values -- a review ⋮ Comparability of Segmented Line Regression Models ⋮ Comparing Three Groups ⋮ Why estimation alone causes Markowitz portfolio selection to fail and what we might do about it ⋮ Constrained Bayesian Rules for Testing Statistical Hypotheses ⋮ Ordinal classification based on the sequential covering strategy ⋮ A new closed multiple testing procedure for hierarchical families of hypotheses ⋮ Sequentially rejective pairwise testing procedures ⋮ Extensions of multiple testing procedures based on Simes' test ⋮ Modifications of the Bonferroni-Holm procedure for a multi-way ANOVA ⋮ A sequential elimination procedure for choosing the best population(s) based on multiple testing ⋮ A multiple testing method for hypotheses structured in a directed acyclic graph ⋮ Discussion on “Testing small study effects in multivariate meta‐analysis” by Chuan Hong, Georgia Salanti, Sally Morton, Richard Riley, Haitao Chu, Stephen E. Kimmel and Yong Chen ⋮ The sequential rejection principle of familywise error control ⋮ A closed max‐t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve ⋮ Test for Trend With a Multinomial Outcome ⋮ An interpretability improvement for fuzzy rule bases obtained by the iterative rule learning approach ⋮ On the expected runtime of multiple testing algorithms with bounded error ⋮ A probability inequality for ranges and its application to maximum range test procedures ⋮ Multiple testing in ordinal data models ⋮ Multiple testing along a tree ⋮ A permutation approach for ranking of multivariate populations ⋮ Basic concepts of multiple tests -- a survey ⋮ Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. ⋮ Tractability of most probable explanations in multidimensional Bayesian network classifiers ⋮ A parameter-free particle swarm optimization algorithm using performance classifiers ⋮ Tables for pairwise multiple comparisons using shaffer's modifiedsequentially-rejective procedure ⋮ Modified Simes' critical values under independence ⋮ Nonparametric statistical analysis for multiple comparison of machine learning regression algorithms ⋮ Evolution of Gaussian process kernels for machine translation post-editing effort estimation ⋮ Performance of some multiple comparison tests under heteroscedasticity and dependency ⋮ Nonparametric multiple comparison procedures for unbalanced two-way layouts ⋮ Large multiple neighborhood search for the clustered vehicle-routing problem ⋮ Resampling DEA estimates of investment fund performance ⋮ General theory of mixture procedures for gatekeeping ⋮ A region-based multiple testing method for hypotheses ordered in space or time ⋮ Some multiple comparison procedures for variances from non-normal populations. ⋮ Rejoinder ⋮ Only closed testing procedures are admissible for controlling false discovery proportions ⋮ Bonferroni procedures for logically related hypotheses. ⋮ Critical values for multiple testing and comparisons: one step and step down procedures. ⋮ Some remarks on Simes-type multiple tests of significance. ⋮ A Framework for Monte Carlo based Multiple Testing ⋮ Learning tractable Bayesian networks in the space of elimination orders ⋮ Simple Stepwise Tests of Hypotheses and Multiple Comparisons ⋮ Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut. ⋮ IDENTIFYING THE MAXIMUM SAFE DOSE: A MULTIPLE TESTING APPROACH