The wake of Berkeley's analyst: Rigor mathematicae?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3775500
DOI10.1016/0039-3681(87)90003-3zbMath0636.01004OpenAlexW1998301802WikidataQ56228038 ScholiaQ56228038MaRDI QIDQ3775500
Publication date: 1987
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(87)90003-3
Related Items (11)
Toward a history of mathematics focused on procedures ⋮ A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography ⋮ Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus ⋮ Stevin numbers and reality ⋮ A Cauchy-Dirac delta function ⋮ Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking ⋮ Leibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyond ⋮ Toward a clarity of the extreme value theorem ⋮ Cauchy's Continuum ⋮ Proofs and retributions, or: why Sarah can't take limits ⋮ Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: an account in three modern frameworks
This page was built for publication: The wake of Berkeley's analyst: Rigor mathematicae?