scientific article
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3823616
zbMath0671.62010MaRDI QIDQ3823616
Publication date: 1985
Title: zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
choiceprobabilitycalibrationgroupimpossibility theoremshonestysubjectivemarginalityconsensus of opinionexternal Bayesianitygroup consensus probability distributionindependence of experts
Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)
Related Items (24)
SUPPORT FOR GEOMETRIC POOLING ⋮ A foundational approach to generalising the maximum entropy inference process to the multi-agent context ⋮ Several Bayesians: a review. (With discussion) ⋮ Conditionally externally Bayesian pooling operators in chain graphs ⋮ Coherent combination of experts' opinions. (With discussion) ⋮ An in-depth analysis of information markets with aggregate uncertainty ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Sustainable cooperation in dynamic games on event trees with players' asymmetric beliefs ⋮ Testimony as evidence: more problems for linear pooling ⋮ Risk analysis of catastrophes using experts' judgements: An empirical study on risk analysis of major civil aircraft accidents in Europe ⋮ Probabilistic opinion pooling with imprecise probabilities ⋮ Test procedures based on combination of Bayesian evidences for \(H_{0}\) ⋮ On the determination of strength of belief for decision support under uncertainty. II: Fusing strengths of belief. ⋮ A Bayesian method for calibration and aggregation of expert judgement ⋮ An axiomatic characterization of wagering mechanisms ⋮ Similarity-based inference as evidential reasoning ⋮ Aggregating expert judgement ⋮ Pooling operators with the marginalization property ⋮ Truthful aggregation of budget proposals ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Updating beliefs about variables given new information on how those variables relate ⋮ Subjective estimation of the delay time distribution in maintenance modelling ⋮ Over-the-Air computation for distributed machine learning and consensus in large wireless networks ⋮ Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but Scientific
This page was built for publication:
