Beyond pareto optimality: The necessity of interpersonal cardinal utilities in distributional judgements and social choice
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3964280
DOI10.1007/BF01282907zbMath0498.90004OpenAlexW2069016199MaRDI QIDQ3964280
Publication date: 1982
Published in: Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01282907
fairnesssocial choiceinconsistencyweak Pareto principledistributional judgementsinterpersonal comparisons of cardinal utilitynon- cardinalistic ranking ruleparadox of welfare criteria
Related Items (2)
The incompatibility of individualism and ordinalism ⋮ Some implications of an intensity measure of envy
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- On the concept of fairness
- Interpersonal level comparability implies comparability of utility differences
- The incompatibility of individualism and ordinalism
- On Pareto-efficiency and the no-envy concept of equity
- A revised concept of distributional equity
- Pitfalls in the theory of fairness
- Why ethical measures of inequality need interpersonal comparisons
- Social Choice Theory: The Single-Profile and Multi-Profile Approaches
- Possibility Theorems with Interpersonally Comparable Welfare Levels
- Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory
- On the Possibility of "Fair" Collective Choice Rule
- Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions and Social Welfare Functions
- An Impossibility Theorem for Fixed Preferences: A Dictatorial Bergson- Samuelson Welfare Function
- Bergson-Samuelson Social Welfare Functions and the Theory of Social Choice
- An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation
- Fair Net Trades
This page was built for publication: Beyond pareto optimality: The necessity of interpersonal cardinal utilities in distributional judgements and social choice
