The Relative Importance of Permanent and Transitory Components: Identification and Some Theoretical Bounds
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4006257
DOI10.2307/2951678zbMath0850.62888OpenAlexW2096480312MaRDI QIDQ4006257
Publication date: 26 September 1992
Published in: Econometrica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/64144
Related Items (16)
Exploiting cross-section variation for unit root inference in dynamic data ⋮ Import prices, export prices and the current account ⋮ Large shocks vs. small shocks. (Or does size matter? May be so.) ⋮ The relationship between the Beveridge-Nelson decomposition and other permanent-transitory decompositions that are popular in economics ⋮ The dynamics of hours worked and technology ⋮ Testing of unit root and other nonstationary hypotheses in macroeconomic time series ⋮ What are the Differences in Trend Cycle Decompositions by Beveridge and Nelson and by Unobserved Component Models? ⋮ Estimating convergence for Asian economies using dynamic random variable models ⋮ Time to implement and aggregate fluctuations ⋮ A note on the two assumptions of standard unobserved components models ⋮ Detecting Unobserved Heterogeneity in Efficient Prices via Classifier-Lasso ⋮ Misinterpreting the dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances ⋮ A structural model with interventions for New Zealand sawn timber production ⋮ Time series properties of aggregate output fluctuations ⋮ Convergence empirics across economies with (some) capital mobility. ⋮ Calculation of aggregate demand and supply disturbances from a common trends model
This page was built for publication: The Relative Importance of Permanent and Transitory Components: Identification and Some Theoretical Bounds
