A new approach for bounding awards in bankruptcy problems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:404776
DOI10.1007/S00355-013-0789-0zbMath1297.91095OpenAlexW1990163717MaRDI QIDQ404776
José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez, M. Carmen Marco-Gil
Publication date: 4 September 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2072/182719
Related Items (3)
Compromising in bifocal distribution games: the average value ⋮ Resource allocations with guaranteed awards in claims problems ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
Cites Work
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
- Distributive justice in taxation
- The Nash bargaining solution is optimal
- A noncooperative justification for egalitarian surplus sharing
- A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
- A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
- Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Sustainability in bankruptcy problems.
- Lower bounds and recursive methods for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
- A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization
- The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule
This page was built for publication: A new approach for bounding awards in bankruptcy problems