Important aspects in the formulation of solid-fluid debris-flow models. I: Thermodynamic implications
From MaRDI portal
Publication:407662
DOI10.1007/s00161-010-0153-xzbMath1234.74019OpenAlexW1971706859MaRDI QIDQ407662
Lukas Schneider, Kolumban Hutter
Publication date: 27 March 2012
Published in: Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-010-0153-x
Related Items (4)
Thermodynamically consistent modeling of granular-fluid mixtures incorporating pore pressure evolution and hypoplastic behavior ⋮ Important aspects in the formulation of solid-fluid debris-flow models. II: Constitutive modelling ⋮ On analytical solutions of a two-phase mass flow model ⋮ Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Plasticity and geophysical flows: a review
- A new Savage-Hutter type model for submarine avalanches and generated tsunami
- Non-Newtonian fluids with a yield stress
- Modeling shallow gravity-driven solid-fluid mixtures over arbitrary topography
- Theory of multicomponent fluids
- Constitutive models for granular materials including quasi-static frictional behaviour: Toward a thermodynamic theory of plasticity
- On the thermodynamics of a mixture of isotropic materials with constraints
- A hierarchy of avalanche models on arbitrary topography
- Method of Lagrange multipliers for exploitation of the entropy principle
- CLoE, a new rate‐type constitutive model for geomaterials theoretical basis and implementation
- Geophysical granular and particle-laden flows: review of the field
- A two-fluid model for avalanche and debris flows
- Shear and objective stress rates in hypoplasticity by D. Kolymbas and I. Herle. Author's Reply to Discussion by A. Beghini and Z. P. Bazant, R. Chambon and A. Niemunis of ‘Shear and objective stress rates in hypoplasticity’
This page was built for publication: Important aspects in the formulation of solid-fluid debris-flow models. I: Thermodynamic implications