Which Response Surface Design Is Best: A Performance Comparison of Several Types of Quadratic Response Surface Designs in Symmetric Regions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4110490
DOI10.2307/1268656zbMath0342.62051OpenAlexW4248832172MaRDI QIDQ4110490
Publication date: 1976
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1268656
Related Items (15)
A new approach to the construction of optimal designs ⋮ A class of composite designs for response surface methodology ⋮ Response surface optimization for a nonlinearly constrained irregular experimental design space ⋮ The robustness of response surface designs with errors in factor levels ⋮ Machine learning and design of experiments with an application to product innovation in the chemical industry ⋮ Finding maximum G-criterion values for central composite designs on the hypercube ⋮ Determinant efficiencies in ill-conditioned models ⋮ An integrative framework for geometric and hidden projections in three-level fractional factorial designs ⋮ New 3-level response surface designs constructed from incomplete block designs ⋮ Some response surface designs for finding optimal conditions ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ An introduction to designh optimality with an overview of the literature ⋮ On comparing the prediction variances of some central composite designs in spherical regions: a review ⋮ Discussion of ``Response surface design evaluation and comparison by Christine Anderson-Cook, Connie Borror and Douglas Montgomery ⋮ Small response surface designs for metamodel estimation
This page was built for publication: Which Response Surface Design Is Best: A Performance Comparison of Several Types of Quadratic Response Surface Designs in Symmetric Regions