Share the gain, share the pain? Almost transferable utility, changes in production possibilities, and bargaining solutions

DOI10.1016/J.MATHSOCSCI.2011.08.002zbMath1237.91158OpenAlexW3122497250MaRDI QIDQ418041

Justin Leroux, Elisabeth Gugl

Publication date: 14 May 2012

Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://www.hec.ca/iea/cahiers/2009/iea0905_jleroux.pdf

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cooperative games (91A12) (n)-person games, (n>2) (91A06) Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand) (91B54) Decision theory for games (91A35)

Related Items (1)

On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Monotonicity and equal-opportunity equivalence in bargaining
• Bargaining solutions at work: qualitative differences in policy implications
• Testable implications of transferable utility
• When do market games have transferable utility?
• Monotonicity properties of bargaining solutions when applied to economics
• Comparing bargaining solutions in the shadow of conflict: how norms against threats can have real effects
• Independence of Allocative Efficiency from Distribution in the Theory of Public Goods
• The Bargaining Problem
• Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem
• Monotonicity and Solidarity Axioms in Economics and Game Theory

This page was built for publication: Share the gain, share the pain? Almost transferable utility, changes in production possibilities, and bargaining solutions