Why not proportional?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:423056
DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.012zbMath1237.91196OpenAlexW2180825801MaRDI QIDQ423056
Publication date: 18 May 2012
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.012
Related Items (5)
Seat allocation in federal second chambers: logical models in Canada and Germany ⋮ The number of parties and decision-making in legislatures ⋮ Democracy for polarized committees: the tale of Blotto's lieutenants ⋮ Fair apportionment in the view of the Venice Commission's recommendation ⋮ Computing the optimal weights in a utilitarian model of apportionment
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Evaluating competing criteria for allocating parliamentary seats
- Computing the optimal weights in a utilitarian model of apportionment
- Assessing success and decisiveness in voting situations
- Who has the power in the EU?
- L. S. Penrose's limit theorem: proof of some special cases.
- Welfarist evaluations of decision rules under interstate utility dependencies
- Welfarist evaluations of decision rules for boards of representatives
- Square Root Voting System, Optimal Threshold and $$ \uppi $$ π
This page was built for publication: Why not proportional?
