A multi‐criterion experimental comparison of three multi‐attribute weight measurement methods

DOI<link itemprop=identifier href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199811)7:6<340::AID-MCDA206>3.0.CO;2-S" /><340::AID-MCDA206>3.0.CO;2-S 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199811)7:6<340::AID-MCDA206>3.0.CO;2-SzbMath0917.90217OpenAlexW2038294939MaRDI QIDQ4243017

Jenshou Yang, Mingshen Wang

Publication date: 11 May 1999

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199811)7:6<340::aid-mcda206>3.0.co;2-s

zbMATH Keywords

AHPSMARTmultiple criteriaexperimental comparisonanalytical hierarchy processenvironmental impact assessmentequal weight averaging modelfunctional measurementmulti-attribute weight measurementsimple multi-attribute rating technique

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (1)

Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach

This page was built for publication: A multi‐criterion experimental comparison of three multi‐attribute weight measurement methods