Control of the false discovery proportion for independently tested null hypotheses
From MaRDI portal
Publication:428331
DOI10.1155/2012/320425zbMath1245.62089OpenAlexW2064005198WikidataQ58910959 ScholiaQ58910959MaRDI QIDQ428331
Publication date: 19 June 2012
Published in: Journal of Probability and Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/320425
Related Items (2)
Only closed testing procedures are admissible for controlling false discovery proportions ⋮ Higher criticism for large-scale inference, especially for rare and weak effects
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses
- Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate
- The asymptotic distribution of the supremum of the standardized empirical distribution function on subintervals
- Bounds for median and 50 percentage points of binomial and negative binomial distribution
- Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data
- Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures.
- A stochastic process approach to false discovery control.
- Generalizations of the familywise error rate
- False Discovery Control for Multiple Tests of Association Under General Dependence
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
- Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the False Discovery Rate Procedure
- Statistical significance for genomewide studies
- Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, with application to DNA Microarray Data
- The Calculation of Distributions of Kolmogorov-Smirnov Type Statistics Including a Table of Significance Points for a Particular Case
This page was built for publication: Control of the false discovery proportion for independently tested null hypotheses
