A comparison of tests for trend with historical controls in carcinogen bioassay

DOI10.2307/3315326zbMath0878.62081OpenAlexW1972097314MaRDI QIDQ4344820

Daniel Krewski, Karen Y. Fung, Robert T. Smythe

Publication date: 5 January 1998

Published in: Canadian Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/3315326

zbMATH Keywords

tablesbootstraprobustnesslogistic modelancillary statisticmarginal likelihoodscore statisticbeta-binomial distributiontrend testsquasilikelihoodcarcinogen bioassayconditional marginal likelihoodextrabionomial variation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03)

Related Items (2)

Incorporating historical control information into quantal bioassay with Bayesian approach ⋮ From Quantal Counts to Mechanisms and Systems: The Past, Present, and Future of Biometrics in Environmental Toxicology

Uses Software

• IMSL Numerical Libraries

Cites Work

• The use of historical control information in modelling dose response relationships in carcinogenesis
• Incorporating historical controls in testing for a trend in multinomial proportions
• A Stabilized Moment Estimator for the Beta-Binomial Distribution
• Hypothesis testing of regression parameters in semiparametric generalized linear models for cluster correlated data
• Combining Historical and Randomized Controls for Assessing Trends in Proportions
• Binary Regression Using an Extended Beta-Binomial Distribution, With Discussion of Correlation Induced by Covariate Measurement Errors
• Incorporating Historical Controls in Testing for a Trend in Proportions
• On the Robustness of Combined Tests for Trends in Proportions
• 394: The Analysis of Binary Responses from Toxicological Experiments Involving Reproduction and Teratogenicity
• Using Historical Controls in the Analysis of Developmental Toxicity Data
• Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests

This page was built for publication: A comparison of tests for trend with historical controls in carcinogen bioassay