Reconsidering the Fundamental Contributions of Fisher and Neyman on Experimentation and Sampling

DOI10.2307/1403784zbMath0899.62003OpenAlexW2316166735MaRDI QIDQ4358383

Judith M. Tanur, Stephen E. Fienberg

Publication date: 17 November 1998

Published in: International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/a617f75136d7645fdbcc60bac4ced1df19febedd

zbMATH Keywords

stratificationclusteringrandomizationdesign of sample surveys

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Design of statistical experiments (62K99) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) History of statistics (62-03)

Related Items (7)

What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications ⋮ Bayesian models and methods in public policy and government settings ⋮ Corrado Gini, a pioneer in balanced sampling and inequality theory ⋮ Learning from our GWAS mistakes: from experimental design to scientific method ⋮ A paradox from randomization-based causal inference ⋮ Optimal Sampling Design with Random Size Clusters for a Mixed Model with Measurement Errors ⋮ Comments on the Neyman-Fisher controversy and its consequences

This page was built for publication: Reconsidering the Fundamental Contributions of Fisher and Neyman on Experimentation and Sampling