A Proposed Design and Analysis for Comparing Digital and Analog Mammography

DOI10.1198/016214501753168136zbMath1031.62093OpenAlexW2064036617MaRDI QIDQ4419432

Stuart G. Baker, Paul F. Pinsky

Publication date: 13 August 2003

Published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753168136

zbMATH Keywords

sensitivitysample sizecancer screeningspecificitypermutation testdiagnostic testingdouble samplingverification bias

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Related Items (8)

Rethinking an ROC partial area index for evaluating the classification performance at a high specificity range ⋮ A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy in the absence of the golden standard test based on the paired partial areas under receiver operating characteristic curves ⋮ Improved Estimation of the Noncentrality Parameter Distribution from a Large Number of t‐Statistics, with Applications to False Discovery Rate Estimation in Microarray Data Analysis ⋮ Partial AUC maximization in a linear combination of dichotomizers ⋮ Subgroup specific incremental value of new markers for risk prediction ⋮ Partial AUC Estimation and Regression ⋮ Subgroup Specific Incremental Value of New Markers for Risk Prediction ⋮ A Novel Design for Estimating Relative Accuracy of Screening Tests When Complete Disease Verification Is Not Feasible

This page was built for publication: A Proposed Design and Analysis for Comparing Digital and Analog Mammography