Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims

DOI10.1007/s00199-010-0575-5zbMath1247.91033OpenAlexW2004558149WikidataQ59972740 ScholiaQ59972740MaRDI QIDQ447526

William Thomson

Publication date: 4 September 2012

Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10535/4005

zbMATH Keywords

operatorsLorenz dominationclaims problemsconsistent rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory for games (91A35)

Related Items

Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims ⋮ Inequality minimising subsidy and taxation ⋮ Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive ⋮ For claims problems, compromising between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses ⋮ Refining the Lorenz‐ranking of rules for claims problems on restricted domains ⋮ Egalitarianism in the queueing problem ⋮ Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses ⋮ Deviation from proportionality and Lorenz-domination for claims problems ⋮ For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules ⋮ Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits ⋮ Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update ⋮ No-envy in the Queueing Problem with Multiple Identical Machines

Cites Work

• Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses
• Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
• On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction
• The minimal overlap rule revisited
• On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency
• Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
• A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
• Two derivations of the uniform rule and an application to bankruptcy
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
• The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
• Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims
• Bankruptcy games and the Ibn Ezra's proposal
• The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
• Inequality preserving rationing
• A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
• On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
• A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization