The two-sample \(t\) test: pre-testing its assumptions does not pay off

DOI10.1007/s00362-009-0224-xzbMath1247.62056OpenAlexW2005970478MaRDI QIDQ451495

Karl Moder, Klaus D. Kubinger, Dieter A. M. K. Rasch

Publication date: 23 September 2012

Published in: Statistical Papers (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-009-0224-x

zbMATH Keywords

pre-teststwo-sample \(t\) testwelch-testWilcoxon-\(U\) test

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Related Items (8)

Pseudo-Ranks: The Better Way of Ranking? ⋮ Preliminary tests when comparing means ⋮ An approach to confirmatory testing of subpopulations in clinical trials ⋮ On hyperbolic transformations to normality ⋮ Pretesting strategies for homoscedasticity when comparing means. Their robustness facing non-normality ⋮ <scp>ANOVA</scp> and the variance homogeneity assumption: Exploring a better gatekeeper ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Type I and II error rates of Bayesian two-sample tests under preliminary assessment of normality in balanced and unbalanced designs and its influence on the reproducibility of medical research

Cites Work

• A method for simulating non-normal distributions
• How robust are tests for two independent samples?
• Preliminary Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Normality do not Validate the One-Sample Student t
• The effect of preliminary normality goodness of fit tests on subsequent inference.
• On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: The two-sample \(t\) test: pre-testing its assumptions does not pay off