Chaos, but in voting and apportionments?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4525771
DOI10.1073/pnas.96.19.10568zbMath1047.91527OpenAlexW2028919025WikidataQ36028804 ScholiaQ36028804MaRDI QIDQ4525771
Publication date: 24 January 2001
Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.19.10568
Cites Work
- The Borda dictionary
- Concorcet's principle implies the no show paradox
- A dictionary for voting paradoxes
- Inverted orders for monotone scoring rules
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control
- Cyclic sets in multidimensional voting models
- The likelihood of dubious election outcomes
- Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes. I: Pairwise votes
- Generic Instability of Majority Rule
- The Quota Method of Apportionment
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- A chaotic Exploration of Aggregation Paradoxes