Bell's theorem and the problem of decidability between the views of Einstein and Bohr

DOI10.1073/pnas.251525098zbMath0995.81002OpenAlexW2043112166WikidataQ33951742 ScholiaQ33951742MaRDI QIDQ4547674

Walter Philipp, Karl Hess

Publication date: 11 September 2002

Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc64664

zbMATH Keywords

local hidden parameterstime-like correlated parametersinstantaneous actions at a distance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum computation (81P68)

Related Items (13)

THE HESS-PHILIPP MODEL IS NON-LOCAL ⋮ Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments: a discrete data driven approach ⋮ When champions meet: rethinking the Bohr-Einstein debate ⋮ Bell's theorem and the consistency problem of common probability distributions ⋮ On the origin of quantum mechanics ⋮ Bell inequalities, experimental protocols and contextuality ⋮ Quantum theory as the most robust description of reproducible experiments ⋮ What's wrong with this criticism ⋮ A local realistic theory for Mermin's EPR experiment ⋮ No time loophole in Bell's theorem: The Hess–Philipp model is nonlocal ⋮ Breakdown of Bell's theorem for certain objective local parameter spaces ⋮ Computer Simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Experiments ⋮ Bell’s inequality, random sequence, and quantum key distribution

Cites Work

• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?

This page was built for publication: Bell's theorem and the problem of decidability between the views of Einstein and Bohr