The Behaviour of Rods and Clocks in General Relativity and the Meaning of the Metric Field
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4557057
DOI10.1007/978-1-4939-7708-6_2zbMath1402.83005arXiv0911.4440OpenAlexW1672969276MaRDI QIDQ4557057
Publication date: 29 November 2018
Published in: Einstein Studies (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4440
History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) Geometrodynamics and the holographic principle (83E05) Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems) (83C05) History of relativity and gravitational theory (83-03)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- On the recovery of geometrodynamics from two different sets of first principles
- Gravity: The inside story
- Light clocks and the clock hypothesis
- Why Einstein did not believe that general relativity geometrizes gravity
- The Confrontation Between General Relativity and Experiment
- The origins of length contraction: I. The FitzGerald–Lorentz deformation hypothesis
- EINSTEIN GRAVITY AS AN EMERGENT PHENOMENON?
- The tensor-vector-scalar theory and its cosmology
- Gravity as an emergent phenomenon: A conceptual description
- Relativity without relativity
- Flavour-Oscillation Clocks and the Geometricity of General Relativity
- Relativity, the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Contraction, and Quantum Theory
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: The Behaviour of Rods and Clocks in General Relativity and the Meaning of the Metric Field