Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4571138
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_2zbMath1392.68393OpenAlexW2529699635MaRDI QIDQ4571138
Publication date: 6 July 2018
Published in: PRIMA 2016: Princiles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_2
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
- Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Lexicographic priorities in default logic
- Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- Abstract argumentation systems
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
- Closure and Consistency In Logic-Associated Argumentation
- A Numerical Approach to the Merging of Argumentation Networks
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- A framework for compiling preferences in logic programs
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Argumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic Approach