Balancing Rationality and Utility in Logic-Based Argumentation with Classical Logic Sentences and Belief Contraction
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4571144
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_10zbMath1392.68392OpenAlexW2529402078MaRDI QIDQ4571144
Publication date: 6 July 2018
Published in: PRIMA 2016: Princiles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_10
Cites Work
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change
- A survey of multiple contractions
- On the logic of iterated belief revision
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Logical modes of attack in argumentation networks
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
This page was built for publication: Balancing Rationality and Utility in Logic-Based Argumentation with Classical Logic Sentences and Belief Contraction
