The Pros and Cons of Compressive Sensing for Wideband Signal Acquisition: Noise Folding versus Dynamic Range

DOI10.1109/TSP.2012.2201149zbMath1393.94678OpenAlexW1500801837MaRDI QIDQ4573984

John R. Treichler, Jason N. Laska, Richard G. Baraniuk, Mark A. Davenport

Publication date: 18 July 2018

Published in: IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2012.2201149

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory in information and communication theory (94A20)

Related Items (10)

Book Review: A mathematical introduction to compressive sensing ⋮ Quantization and Compressive Sensing ⋮ An efficient radiation analysis approach through compressive model for laser driven inertial confinement fusion ⋮ Compressive sensing of analog signals using discrete prolate spheroidal sequences ⋮ Analysis of convergence for the alternating direction method applied to joint sparse recovery ⋮ On Collaborative Compressive Sensing Systems: The Framework, Design, and Algorithm ⋮ Statistical properties of SNR for compressed measurements ⋮ Sparse Recovery via Partial Regularization: Models, Theory, and Algorithms ⋮ Spectrum blind reconstruction and direction of arrival estimation of multi-band signals at sub-Nyquist sampling rates ⋮ Sparse-filtering in directional lifting wavelet transform domain based Bayesian compressive sensing

This page was built for publication: The Pros and Cons of Compressive Sensing for Wideband Signal Acquisition: Noise Folding versus Dynamic Range