Comment on ‘Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference’

DOI10.1088/1751-8121/AA8D24zbMath1382.81027OpenAlexW2782694723MaRDI QIDQ4606200

Lev Vaidman

Publication date: 1 March 2018

Published in: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa8d24

zbMATH Keywords

weak measurementstwo-state vector formalismnested interferometerpast of a particle

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum optics (81V80) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15)

Related Items (3)

Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem? ⋮ Reply to the comment on ‘Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference’ ⋮ Quantum Cryptography: Key Distribution and Beyond

Cites Work

• Can a dove prism change the past of a single photon?
• Position measurements in the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics
• Non-representative quantum mechanical weak values
• Response to comment on ``Non-representative quantum mechanical weak values by Ben-Israel and Vaidman
• Comment on ``Non-representative quantum mechanical weak values
• Asking photons where they have been in plain language
• Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference
• Counterfactuality of ‘counterfactual’ communication

This page was built for publication: Comment on ‘Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference’