Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?”

DOI10.1002/BIMJ.201800188zbMATH Open1412.62153OpenAlexW2886908873WikidataQ90705183 ScholiaQ90705183MaRDI QIDQ4622562

David C. Hoaglin

Publication date: 12 February 2019

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201800188

zbMATH Keywords

meta-analysisnormality assumptions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Central limit and other weak theorems (60F05) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Related Items (6)

Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?” Meta‐analysis and normality assumptions in statistical bioinformatics ⋮ Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?” A Bayesian perspective ⋮ Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?” ⋮ Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?” ⋮ Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?” ⋮ Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?”

This page was built for publication: Contribution to the discussion of “When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?”

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4622562)