A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities

DOI10.1007/3-540-61313-7_97zbMath1419.68129OpenAlexW2401604216MaRDI QIDQ4632320

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor

Publication date: 29 April 2019

Published in: Practical Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_97

zbMATH Keywords

default logiclogic programmingargumentation frameworklegal reasoningground instance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic programming (68N17)

Related Items (1)

Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
• An argumentation framework in default logic
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A Fixpoint Semantics for Ordered Logic
• Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
• Reliable Semantics for Extended Logic Programs with Rule Prioritization

This page was built for publication: A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities