Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
From MaRDI portal
Publication:465598
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2013.12.001zbMath1433.68446OpenAlexW2069367013MaRDI QIDQ465598
Souhila Kaci, Christophe Labreuche
Publication date: 23 October 2014
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.12.001
Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)
Related Items (1)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- A behavioral foundation for fuzzy measures
- Fuzzy implications
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- Implication in fuzzy logic
- How to reason defeasibly
- On the intuition of rank-dependent utility
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Arguing with Valued Preference Relations
- Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
This page was built for publication: Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
