A Note on the Adaptive Control of False Discovery Rates

DOI10.1111/j.1369-7412.2003.05527.xzbMath1062.62130OpenAlexW1990403317MaRDI QIDQ4665847

Mik Black

Publication date: 11 April 2005

Published in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7412.2003.05527.x

zbMATH Keywords

simulationsmultiple comparisons

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)

Related Items

Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses in high-dimensional data under dependence, Asymptotically optimal sequential FDR and pFDR control with (or without) prior information on the number of signals, Evaluations of FDR-controlling procedures in multiple hypothesis testing, Two simple sufficient conditions for FDR control, Controlling the Familywise Error Rate with Plug-in Estimator for the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, Mixed model prediction and small area estimation. (With comments of P. Hall, D. Morales, C. N. Morris, J. N. K. Rao, and J. L. Eltinge), Dependence aliasing and the control of family-wise error rate in multiple hypothesis testing, A clarifying comparison of methods for controlling the false discovery rate, Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, with application to DNA Microarray Data

Cites Work

• On the False Discovery Rate and Expected Type I Errors
• A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
• Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the False Discovery Rate Procedure
• Statistical significance for genomewide studies