Combining high‐order accuracy with non‐oscillatory methods through monotonicity preservation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4667658
DOI10.1002/fld.875zbMath1066.65087OpenAlexW2078805224MaRDI QIDQ4667658
James R. Kamm, William J. Rider, Jeffrey A. Greenough
Publication date: 21 April 2005
Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.875
conservation lawsnumerical exampleshigh-resolution methodshigh-order accuracymonotonicity preservingessentially non-oscillatory methods
Hyperbolic conservation laws (35L65) Finite difference methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M06) Error bounds for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M15)
Related Items
A high-order symmetrical weighted hybrid ENO-flux limiter scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, A General Strategy for Physics-Based Model Validation Illustrated with Earthquake Phenomenology, Atmospheric Radiative Transfer, and Computational Fluid Dynamics, A hybrid ENO reconstruction with limiters for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, A modified high-order symmetrical WENO scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, A weighted ENO-flux limiter scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, Modeling turbulent flow with implicit LES
