In Defence of Dialetheism: A Reply to Beziau and Tkaczyk

DOI10.12775/LLP.2017.030zbMath1456.03050MaRDI QIDQ4683225

No author found.

Publication date: 20 September 2018

Published in: Logic and Logical Philosophy (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

dialetheismparaconsistent logicslogic of paradoxself-referential paradoxes

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Related Items (2)

Identifying logical evidence ⋮ A Brief Note on Béziau’s “Rather Trivial Theorem” About LP

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• The preservation of coherence
• The logic of paradox
• Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees'
• Yes, Virginia, there really are paraconsistent logics
• A calculus of antinomics
• On the theory of inconsistent formal systems
• Trivial Dialetheism and the Logic of Paradox
• The Case of Dialetheism
• Logical Pluralism
• Why Priest's reassurance is not reassuring
• Logics of Formal Inconsistency
• Logic for Equivocators

This page was built for publication: In Defence of Dialetheism: A Reply to Beziau and Tkaczyk