Comparison of symbolic and numerical integration methods for an assumed‐stress hybrid shell element

DOI10.1002/cnm.1640110404zbMath0820.73071OpenAlexW1971455627MaRDI QIDQ4834320

Mohammad A. Aminpour, Norman F. jun. Knight, G. Rengarajan

Publication date: 28 May 1995

Published in: Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19950006683

zbMATH Keywords

drilling degrees of freedom

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Symbolic computation and algebraic computation (68W30) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Membranes (74K15)

Related Items

Finite element linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic analysis of structural elements: a bibliography (1992‐1995) ⋮ Explicit integration of the stiffness matrix of a four-noded-plane-elasticity finite element

Uses Software

• Maple
• Mathematica

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Covering of 2-dimensional manifolds with open cells
• Computerized symbolic manipulation in nonlinear finite element analysis
• An assumed-stress hybrid 4-node shell element with drilling degrees of freedom
• Computerized symbolic manipulation in structural mechanics—Progress and potential
• Symbolic generation of finite element stiffness matrices
• An efficient quadrilateral element for plate bending analysis
• Improved assumed‐stress hybrid shell element with drilling degrees of freedom for linear stress, buckling and free vibration analyses