Can strategizing in round-robin subtournaments be avoided?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:483532
DOI10.1007/s00355-013-0767-6zbMath1302.91087OpenAlexW2044535676MaRDI QIDQ483532
Publication date: 17 December 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0767-6
Related Items (13)
Condorcet-consistent and approximately strategyproof tournament rules ⋮ The efficacy of tournament designs ⋮ Catch-Up: A Rule That Makes Service Sports More Competitive ⋮ Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: a case study from sports ⋮ League competitions and fairness ⋮ How to design a multi-stage tournament when some results are carried over? ⋮ How to avoid uncompetitive games? The importance of tie-breaking rules ⋮ Winning isn't everything: how sports competition rules can make you want to lose ⋮ Some Impossibilities of Ranking in Generalized Tournaments ⋮ Strategic manipulation in tournament games ⋮ Fair elimination-type competitions ⋮ Lexicographic solutions for coalitional rankings ⋮ Making the Rules of Sports Fairer
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A survey on the complexity of tournament solutions
- Choosing from a tournament
- Every planar map is four colorable. I: Discharging
- Every planar map is four colorable. II: Reducibility
- Tournament solutions and majority voting
- Social software
- Condorcet choice correspondences for weak tournaments
- Manipulating Tournaments in Cup and Round Robin Competitions
- Ranking the Participants in a Tournament
This page was built for publication: Can strategizing in round-robin subtournaments be avoided?
