Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:484772
DOI10.1007/s13253-012-0126-6zbMath1302.62260OpenAlexW1975518343MaRDI QIDQ484772
Publication date: 7 January 2015
Published in: Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/282977
negative binomial distributionestimation of proportionsgroup testingbias correctioncoverageinverse samplingmid-P
Related Items (8)
Sequential estimation in the group testing problem ⋮ Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples ⋮ Proportional closeness estimation of probability of contamination under group testing ⋮ A New Estimator for a Population Proportion Using Group Testing ⋮ The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification ⋮ Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing ⋮ Bias correction in estimating proportions by imperfect pooled testing ⋮ Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing
Cites Work
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- Significance Tests in Discrete Distributions
- Bayesian inference for prevalence and diagnostic test accuracy based on dual-pooled screening
- Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
- Mid-P confidence intervals based on the likelihood ratio for proportions estimated by group testing
- On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
- ON A METHOD OF ESTIMATING FREQUENCIES
This page was built for publication: Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
