What logical pluralism cannot be

DOI10.1007/S11229-013-0333-XzbMath1318.03014OpenAlexW2002502050MaRDI QIDQ484956

Rosanna Keefe

Publication date: 8 January 2015

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0333-x

zbMATH Keywords

logical consequencereasoningnon-classical logicslogical pluralism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (11)

Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction ⋮ Metalinguistic negotiation and logical pluralism ⋮ Logical pluralism without the normativity ⋮ (Meta)inferential levels of entailment beyond the Tarskian paradigm ⋮ Why logical pluralism? ⋮ A dialogical route to logical pluralism ⋮ Substructural logics, pluralism and collapse ⋮ Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism? ⋮ The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated ⋮ Counterlogicals as counterconventionals ⋮ A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics

Cites Work

• Vagueness, truth and logic
• PLURALISM IN LOGIC
• Logical Pluralism

This page was built for publication: What logical pluralism cannot be