Disposing the leftovers under the consignment contract with revenue sharing: retailer vs supplier
From MaRDI portal
Publication:488888
DOI10.1007/S11424-011-9063-7zbMath1308.90007OpenAlexW2071095775MaRDI QIDQ488888
Publication date: 27 January 2015
Published in: Journal of Systems Science and Complexity (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-9063-7
Hierarchical games (including Stackelberg games) (91A65) Applications of game theory (91A80) Inventory, storage, reservoirs (90B05)
Related Items (4)
Optimal rebate strategies in a two-echelon supply chain with nonlinear and linear multiplicative demands ⋮ Coordinating pricing and advertising decisions for supply chain under consignment contract in the dynamic setting ⋮ Introducing an external terminal operator or not? The decision of ports in a duopoly market ⋮ Fairness of extra-gain guilty in performance of supply chain and contract design
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation
- Note. The Role of Returns Policies in Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Catalogue Goods
- Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations
- Joint Pricing-Production Decisions in Supply Chains of Complementary Products with Uncertain Demand
- Channel Performance Under Consignment Contract with Revenue Sharing
- Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions
This page was built for publication: Disposing the leftovers under the consignment contract with revenue sharing: retailer vs supplier