Condorcet's principle and the strong no-show paradoxes
From MaRDI portal
Publication:490062
DOI10.1007/s11238-013-9401-4zbMath1304.91076OpenAlexW2151765910WikidataQ56457256 ScholiaQ56457256MaRDI QIDQ490062
Publication date: 21 January 2015
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-013-9401-4
Related Items (6)
Exploring the No-Show Paradox for Condorcet Extensions ⋮ Susceptibility to Manipulation by Sincere Truncation: The Case of Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Systems ⋮ Optimal bounds for the no-show paradox via SAT solving ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Welfare maximization entices participation ⋮ Condorcet consistency and the strong no show paradoxes
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Varieties of failure of monotonicity and participation under five voting methods
- One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness
- An extension of the Moulin no show paradox for voting correspondences
- Concorcet's principle implies the no show paradox
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- A dynamical model of political equilibrium
- The strong no show paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences
- Monotonicity properties and their adaptation to irresolute social choice rules
- Ramon Llull: from `Ars electionis' to social choice theory
- Non-monotonicity does not imply the no-show paradox
- Paradoxes of Preferential Voting
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate
- Basic Geometry of Voting
- Scoring run-off paradoxes for variable electorates
This page was built for publication: Condorcet's principle and the strong no-show paradoxes
