Group testing regression model estimation when case identification is a goal
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4917512
DOI10.1002/bimj.201200168zbMath1441.62548OpenAlexW1595405559WikidataQ37344078 ScholiaQ37344078MaRDI QIDQ4917512
Boan Zhang, Christopher R. Bilder, Joshua M. Tebbs
Publication date: 30 April 2013
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3841014
EM algorithmgeneralized linear modelbinary responseprevalence estimationpooled testinglatent response
Related Items (5)
groupTesting: an R package for group testing estimation ⋮ Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments ⋮ Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassification ⋮ Regression models for group testing: identifiability and asymptotics ⋮ Optimizing pooled testing for estimating the prevalence of multiple diseases
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Three-Dimensional Array-Based Group Testing Algorithms
- Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification
- Group testing with a new goal, estimation
- Screening for the Presence of a Disease by Pooling Sera Samples
- Maximally Efficient Two‐Stage Screening
- Regression Models for Disease Prevalence with Diagnostic Tests on Pools of Serum Samples
- Bias and efficiency loss due to misclassified responses in binary regression
- Informative Retesting
- Bayesian Methods for Predicting Interacting Protein Pairs Using Domain Information
This page was built for publication: Group testing regression model estimation when case identification is a goal